Call us now:
Social Synergy The AI Orchestration of Smart Energy Communities
The “Social Synergy” model’s intelligence and operational efficiency are fundamentally rooted in
its sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) software, which serves as its central nervous system
and most valuable asset [1, 2]. This AI is not a single, monolithic algorithm but a suite of
interrelated algorithms designed to orchestrate the operation of distributed energy resources
(photovoltaics and batteries) [1]. Its overarching goals are to achieve maximum economic
efficiency, absolute network stability, and ensure the longevity of the equipment [1].
The software architecture is built upon a proven and academically established model of
Hierarchical Control, which is considered the most modern and resilient approach for managing
smart microgrids [3-5]. This operation is divided into three distinct, yet cooperative, levels [3-7]:
•
Primary Control (Bottom Level): This level represents the physical infrastructure and its local
control systems, acting as the system’s “reflexes” [3, 7-10]. It includes community batteries,
photovoltaic (PV) systems, and member loads [7, 9-11]. Inverters and Battery Management
Systems (BMS) at this level automatically maintain local voltage and frequency stability in
milliseconds without external commands [7, 9, 10]. These BMS algorithms are crucial for the
safety, health, and longevity of the batteries [8, 9].
•
Secondary Control (Middle Level): This is where the AI software functions as a “real-time
coordinator” [3, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13]. When a smart meter detects that a member is drawing
electricity from the grid, it immediately sends a signal to the AI [7, 9, 10, 12]. The AI then instantly
commands the community batteries to inject an equivalent amount of energy back into the
network, effectively bringing the community’s energy balance to zero [7, 9, 10, 12, 13]. This
real-time balancing ensures that the Energy Community does not destabilize or burden the public
network [9, 10, 12].
•
Tertiary Control (Upper Level): This is the strategic level, also managed by the same AI software,
acting as the “economic brain” of the system [3, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14]. The AI incorporates external
data, such as meteorological forecasts, market energy prices, and historical data, to make
informed decisions [7, 9, 10, 13-15]. Its role is to determine the optimal economic plan, including
when to charge and discharge batteries, and when to send a “virtual demand” to the national grid
[7, 9, 10, 13, 14].
The AI software for “Social Synergy” works as a unified Secondary and Tertiary Auditor, meaning
one central AI orchestrates these two complex functions for a set of distributed resources, which
is considered a cutting edge aspect of energy technology [3, 6, 16-19].
The algorithms are categorized into four main pillars to achieve these functions [15, 20-29]:
•
1. Forecasting Algorithms [15, 28, 29]:
◦
Purpose: To predict with maximum possible accuracy (>85% per 15 minutes) the energy
production from PV systems and the energy demand from members for the next 24-48 hours [15,
28, 29].
◦
Inputs: Real-time weather data (sunshine, cloud cover, temperature), historical production and
consumption data from smart meters, and calendar data (e.g., weekday, weekend, holiday) [15,
28, 29].
◦
Process & Logic: They use Machine Learning models, particularly Long Short-Term Memory
(LSTM) for time series analysis, to identify patterns and make accurate predictions [15, 28, 29].
◦
———————–Page 1 End———————–
Strategic Importance: This transforms the system from reactive to proactive, allowing for
intelligent preparation instead of crisis response [15, 28, 29].
•
2. Optimization & Load Shifting Algorithms [14, 28, 29]:
◦
Purpose: To determine the economically optimal plan of action based on predictions, deciding
when to store, discharge, and interact with the main grid [14, 28, 29]. This includes meeting
member needs at the lowest possible cost and avoiding burdening the national grid [14, 28, 29].
◦
Inputs: Forecast curves from forecasting algorithms, current State of Charge (SoC) of all
batteries, and purchase/sale prices of energy from/to the national grid [14, 28, 29].
◦
Process & Logic: They apply optimization algorithms like linear programming or decision trees to
find the lowest cost solution [14, 28, 29]. This includes “load shifting” (storing midday excess for
evening use) and sending “proactive virtual demand” commands to the EAC to charge batteries
when most efficient for the grid [14, 28, 29].
◦
Strategic Importance: Ensures maximum economic efficiency, reduces operating costs, and
transforms the Energy Community into a smart, flexible network partner [14, 28, 29].
•
3. Battery Management System (BMS) Algorithms [8, 28, 29]:
◦
Purpose: To protect the system’s most expensive hardware (the batteries), ensuring their safe
operation and longevity [8, 28, 29].
◦
Inputs: Real-time data from battery sensors in millisecond scale (voltage, current, temperature of
each cell) [8, 28, 29].
◦
Process & Logic: They continuously monitor battery parameters, preventing overcharging, deep
discharge, and overheating [8, 28, 29]. They also balance the charge between cells to maximize
lifespan [8, 28, 29].
◦
Strategic Importance: Ensures the safety, reliability, and long-term return on investment by
protecting the community’s physical assets [8, 28, 29].
•
4. Demand Response Algorithms [12, 28, 29]:
◦
Purpose: To ensure that the Energy Community has a zero energy footprint to the network in real
time, by instantly compensating its members’ consumption [12, 28, 29].
◦
Inputs: Real-time (second-scale) consumption data from members’ smart meters [12, 28, 29].
◦
Process & Logic: A very fast algorithm that, upon detecting a member’s consumption,
immediately commands an EC battery to inject the exact same amount of energy back into the
network [12, 28, 29].
◦
Strategic Importance: Makes the Energy Community “invisible” and beneficial for the national
grid, eliminating demand peaks and allowing operation on saturated networks without the need
for upgrades [12, 28, 29].
———————–Page 2 End———————–
These four categories of algorithms form an integrated, intelligent ecosystem where forecasting
algorithms act as the “eyes,” optimization algorithms as the “strategic brain,” Demand Response
algorithms as the “reflectors” for real-time execution, and BMS algorithms as the “autonomic
nervous system” protecting the physical components [30-32]. This combinatorial and hierarchical
architecture is what makes the “Social Synergy” AI Software a real value multiplier, transforming
simple hardware into an intelligent, self-sustaining, and socially beneficial organization [30, 31,
33].
——————————————————————————–
Social Synergy: AI-Powered Hierarchical Grid Control
The “Social Synergy” model’s technical architecture is built upon a proven and academically
supported model known as Hierarchical Control, which is considered the most modern and
resilient approach for managing smart microgrids [1-4]. This architecture organizes the system’s
operations into three distinct, yet cooperative, levels of control [1-4].
In the “Social Synergy” model, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software functions as a unified
controller, simultaneously executing both Secondary and Tertiary control operations, while relying
on the Primary control of the physical equipment [1-4]. This multi-layered approach ensures
efficient, transparent, and stable energy management for both its members and the wider
national grid [3, 5-8].
Here is a detailed breakdown of the three levels of control within the “Social Synergy” model:
•
1. Primary Control (Bottom Level) [9-14]
◦
Description: This is the physical level of the system, comprising the actual devices and their local
control systems [9-14]. It includes the community batteries, photovoltaic (PV) systems, and
member loads, along with their inverters and Battery Management Systems (BMS) [10-14].
◦
Role: Primary control acts as the system’s “reflexes” [9-14]. Its role is to automatically maintain
local voltage and frequency stability in milliseconds, without waiting for external commands
[9-14]. The BMS algorithms embedded at this level are crucial for ensuring the safety, health,
performance, and longevity of the batteries, preventing issues like overcharging, deep discharge,
and overheating [9, 11, 13].
•
2. Secondary Control (Middle Level) [10-19]
◦
Description: This is where the AI software begins its active role as a “real-time coordinator”
[10-16, 18]. It is directly linked to smart meters of members, which instantly inform the AI when a
member draws electricity from the grid [10, 12, 13, 15, 17-22]. Smart meters are central for
accurately recording these real-time energy flows [10, 17, 21-23].
◦
Role: The AI’s primary responsibility at this level is real-time balancing [10-15, 17-20]. It
instantaneously commands one or more community batteries to inject an equivalent amount of
energy back into the EAC network [10-13, 15, 17-20, 22]. For the Network Operator (EAC/DSD),
this transaction is neutral; the balance is zero, ensuring the Energy Community does not burden
or destabilize the public network [10, 12, 13, 15, 17-20, 22]. This makes the Energy Community
“invisible” to the network [11, 13].
•
3. Tertiary Control (Top Level) [10-14, 16-19, 24, 25]
◦
Description: This is the strategic level, also managed by the same AI software, acting as the
“economic brain” of the system [10-14, 16, 18, 25]. At this level, the AI incorporates external data
———————–Page 3 End———————–
such as meteorological forecasts, market energy prices, and historical data to make informed
decisions [10-14, 16, 18, 24].
◦
Role: The AI determines the optimal economic plan, including when to charge and discharge
batteries, and when to send a “virtual demand” or “proactive energy purchase” signal to the EAC
network, indicating planned energy purchases or injections [10-14, 16-19, 22, 25]. These
forecasting algorithms predict energy production and demand with over 85% accuracy every 15
minutes, making the system preventive rather than merely reactive [11, 13, 18, 24]. Optimization
and load shifting algorithms then use these forecasts to decide ideal battery schedules to meet
member needs at the lowest cost without burdening the grid [11, 13, 18, 25]. This turns the
Energy Community into an active, intelligent “player” that optimizes energy use and cooperates
with the grid [11, 13, 25].
Overall Significance and Innovation: This hierarchical control architecture demonstrates that the
“Social Synergy” model is not merely a theoretical concept but is fully aligned with modern,
robust smart grid control architectures used globally, enhancing its credibility [5, 6, 26, 27]. The
core innovation lies in the unified central AI brain that successfully orchestrates both the tactical
real-time balancing movements (Secondary Control) and the strategic economic optimization
movements (Tertiary Control) for a set of distributed resources [5, 6, 13, 26, 27]. This intelligent
integration transforms a group of consumers into a smart, virtual power plant that provides
valuable balancing services to the grid, adding significant value for all stakeholders [6, 26,
28-30].
——————————————————————————–
Social Synergy: AI-Driven Energy Optimization
Energy optimization is a fundamental and central aspect of the “Social Synergy” model, serving
as the intelligent “brain” that orchestrates the entire energy ecosystem [1, 2]. Its primary role is to
intelligently manage and balance energy flows in real time, ensuring maximum economic
efficiency, absolute network stability, and the longevity of equipment for all involved parties [1, 3].
The Role of AI in Energy Optimization
The “Social Synergy” model’s intelligence and operational efficiency are fundamentally rooted in
its sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) software, which acts as its central nervous system and
most valuable asset [3-5]. This AI is not a single, monolithic algorithm but a suite of interrelated
algorithms designed to orchestrate the operation of distributed energy resources like
photovoltaics (PVs) and batteries [3, 6].
The AI operates within a Hierarchical Control framework, which is a modern and resilient
approach for managing smart microgrids [7-9]. In this model, the AI software functions as a
unified Secondary and Tertiary Auditor [7, 8, 10, 11]:
•
Tertiary Control (Strategic, Economic Optimization): At this upper level, the AI acts as the
“economic brain” [7, 8, 10, 12]. It considers external data such as meteorological forecasts,
market energy prices, and historical data to determine the optimal economic plan for the
community [8, 10, 12]. This involves deciding when to charge and discharge batteries, and when
to send “virtual demand” to the national grid operator (EAC) [8, 10, 12].
•
Secondary Control (Real-time Coordination and Balancing): At this middle level, the AI acts as a
“real-time coordinator” [7, 8, 10, 13]. When smart meters detect a member drawing power from
the grid, the AI immediately instructs the community batteries to inject an equivalent amount of
energy back into the network, effectively bringing the community’s energy balance to zero [8, 10,
13].
•
———————–Page 4 End———————–
Primary Control (Local Stability): This bottom level represents the physical infrastructure
(batteries, PV systems, loads) and their local control systems (inverters, Battery Management
Systems or BMS), acting as the system’s “reflexes” to maintain local voltage and frequency
stability automatically in milliseconds [10, 14-16]. While the AI does not directly control this level,
the BMS algorithms at this level are crucial for the safety and longevity of the equipment,
contributing to overall system efficiency [6, 14, 15, 17, 18].
Algorithmic Categories Driving Optimization
The AI software leverages four main categories of algorithms to achieve comprehensive energy
optimization [6, 17, 18]:
1.
Forecasting Algorithms: These are the “eyes” that see the future [17, 19]. Their main purpose is
to predict with maximum possible accuracy (>85% every 15 minutes) energy production from
PVs and energy demand from members for the next 24-48 hours [6, 17, 18, 20]. They use inputs
like real-time weather data, historical production/consumption from smart meters, and calendar
data. This transforms the system from reactive to proactive, allowing smart preparation instead of
crisis response [6, 17, 18, 20].
2.
Optimization & Load Shifting Algorithms: This is the “strategic brain” that draws up the plan [17,
19]. Based on the forecasts, they determine the economically optimal plan of action, deciding
when to store, when to discharge, and when to interact with the main grid [6, 12, 17, 18]. They
apply optimization algorithms (e.g., linear programming) to find the lowest-cost solutions, such as
absorbing excess power from the grid when prices are low or sending “proactive virtual demand”
to the EAC for scheduled battery charging. This ensures maximum economic efficiency and
transforms the Energy Community into a smart, flexible network partner [6, 12, 17, 18].
3.
Battery Management System (BMS) Algorithms: These are the “guardians” of investment health
and the “autonomic nervous system” that protects the physical assets [6, 14, 17-19]. They
continuously monitor battery parameters (voltage, current, temperature, charge cycles) to ensure
their safety, health, performance, and longevity. They prevent overcharging, deep discharge, and
overheating, and balance cell charges to maximize lifespan, protecting the most expensive
hardware of the system [6, 14, 17, 18].
4.
Demand Response Algorithms: These are the “reflectors” that execute the shot in real time [17,
19]. Their purpose is to ensure the Energy Community has a zero energy footprint on the
network in real time, instantly compensating its members’ consumption [6, 13, 17, 18]. When a
smart meter detects a member drawing energy, the AI immediately commands a community
battery to inject an equivalent amount of energy back into the network. This makes the Energy
Community “invisible” and beneficial for the network, eliminating demand peaks and allowing
operation on saturated networks without the need for upgrades [6, 13, 17, 18].
Value Creation Through Energy Optimization
The AI-driven energy optimization within “Social Synergy” creates significant value across
multiple dimensions:
•
Maximizing Energy Utilization and Eliminating Curtailments: The AI software enables 100%
utilization of produced energy, aiming for zero cuts [16, 21, 22]. By predicting overproduction, the
AI can instruct community batteries to absorb excess energy from the grid that would otherwise
be curtailed (like Cyprus’s record 29% RES cuts in 2024, saving €35-70 million annually) [16,
21-23]. This transforms “wasted” energy into a valuable reserve [16, 21, 22].
•
———————–Page 5 End———————–
Enhancing Grid Stability and RES Penetration: The “Social Synergy” model, through its AI,
transforms energy communities into valuable partners for the Network Operator (EAC) [21, 22,
24, 25]. By ensuring real-time balancing (virtual netting) and proactive “virtual demand,” the EC
becomes a predictable, flexible entity that helps stabilize the network and integrate more volatile
Renewable Energy Sources (RES) effectively [21, 22, 24, 25]. This even allows new RES
capacity to be added to “saturated” grids (like Latsia substation with 0.0 MW available capacity)
without causing stability issues, by absorbing excess energy rather than adding to congestion,
acting as a “treatment for satiety” [16, 21, 22, 24, 25].
•
Driving Financial Viability and Social Benefit: AI’s optimization ensures the model’s economic
viability by prioritizing energy flows (direct consumption, then storage, then sale to the grid),
maximizing energy utilization [2, 21]. This contributes to the significant 24% reduction in
electricity costs for members, making the project financially attractive [21, 26]. The continuous
optimization of energy flows also contributes to the creation of the Social Fund, which receives
substantial annual contributions after the loan is repaid, ensuring long-term sustainability and
social redistribution of profits [21, 26-28]. For a 1,000-member community, this translates to
€420,000 in immediate annual savings and €550,000 in annual contributions to the Social Fund
after 3.5 years [29-31].
•
Enabling a Scalable Global Business Model: The AI software itself is considered the most
valuable asset [5, 21]. It operates on a “White Label” (Software as a Service – SaaS) model,
meaning it can be licensed to other Energy Communities globally for a fee of €0.028/kWh [5, 21,
32, 33]. This high-margin revenue stream, potentially reaching €840 million in annual recurring
revenue (ARR) with just 0.5% market penetration, positions “Social Synergy” to create the first
Cypriot “unicorn” in Green Tech [21, 34-36].
•
Foundation for Future Financial Innovations (RWA Tokenization): The predictable cash flows
generated by the AI software’s licensing fees make it an ideal “Real World Asset” (RWA) for
tokenization on a blockchain [21, 34, 37, 38]. This innovative financing method could allow the
company to raise significant funds for global expansion by selling digital tokens representing
future revenues, creating liquidity and passive income for investors [21, 34, 37, 38].
In conclusion, energy optimization, driven by the sophisticated AI software, is the core innovation
of “Social Synergy” that transforms a collection of hardware into an intelligent, self-balancing,
value-generating ecosystem. It addresses technical challenges of the energy grid, ensures
financial viability, delivers tangible social benefits, and forms the basis for a globally scalable
business model [2, 9, 11, 22].
——————————————————————————–
Social Synergy: AI for Grid Stability and RES Integration
The “Social Synergy” model’s design inherently prioritizes absolute network stability as one of its
core objectives, alongside maximizing economic efficiency and ensuring equipment longevity [1].
This is achieved through a sophisticated hierarchical control system orchestrated by its Artificial
Intelligence (AI) software, which acts as the central nervous system of the entire model [1-4].
The Problem of Network Instability and RES Curtailment
Modern electricity grids, particularly those with high penetration of Renewable Energy Sources
(RES), face significant challenges with stability [5, 6]. Cyprus, for example, holds a “world record”
with 29% of RES production curtailed in 2024, leading to an estimated economic loss of €35-70
million per year [5-9]. This issue is not unique to Cyprus, as Europe incurred €4 billion in
redispatch costs in 2023 due to similar problems [5, 7-9]. Existing network infrastructure has a
limited “RES Reception Capacity,” meaning that connecting new RES projects can cause grid
stability issues if substations become “saturated” [5, 10]. This saturation prevents countries from
———————–Page 6 End———————–
achieving their national RES targets, as seen with the Latsia substation, which has 0.0 MW of
available capacity for new connections [6, 11-13]. The Network Operator often mandates
curtailment to protect against grid destabilization [14].
How “Social Synergy” Enhances Network Stability
The AI software within the “Social Synergy” model is crucial in addressing these instability
challenges, functioning as a unified Secondary and Tertiary Auditor [2, 15].
1.
Hierarchical Control Structure [2, 3, 15-17]:
◦
Primary Control (Bottom Level): This physical layer, including community batteries, PV systems,
and member loads, features inverters and Battery Management Systems (BMS) that
automatically maintain local voltage and frequency stability in milliseconds, acting as the
system’s “reflexes” without external commands [15-17]. These BMS algorithms are vital for
battery safety and longevity, which contributes to overall system reliability [12, 18-21].
◦
Secondary Control (Middle Level): Here, the AI software acts as a “real-time coordinator” [15-17].
When a smart meter detects a member drawing power from the grid, the AI instantly commands
the community batteries to inject an equivalent amount of energy back into the network [15-17,
22-25]. This real-time balancing brings the community’s energy balance to zero, ensuring the
Energy Community (EC) does not destabilize or burden the public network [15-17, 23-27].
◦
Tertiary Control (Upper Level): At this strategic level, the AI software functions as the “economic
brain” [15-17]. It incorporates external data like meteorological forecasts, market prices, and
historical data to determine the optimal economic plan for battery charging and discharging, and
when to send “virtual demand” to the national grid [15-17, 28, 29].
2.
AI Algorithms for Proactive Stability [21, 30-32]:
◦
Forecasting Algorithms: These are the system’s “eyes” [33]. They predict energy production from
PV systems and demand from members with over 85% accuracy every 15 minutes for the next
24-48 hours [12, 21, 30-32, 34]. This transforms the system from being reactive to proactive,
enabling intelligent preparation [21, 28, 30-32].
◦
Optimization & Load Shifting Algorithms: As the “strategic financial brain” [29], these algorithms
use the forecasts to decide the economically optimal plan of action, including when to store or
discharge energy [12, 21, 28, 29, 31, 32]. They implement “load shifting” (e.g., storing midday
solar excess for evening use) and send “proactive virtual demand” commands to the EAC to
charge batteries during optimal grid conditions [12, 21, 29, 31, 32, 35]. This proactive
communication is revolutionary for network administrators, allowing them to plan energy supply
more flexibly [9, 25, 26, 36, 37].
◦
Demand Response Algorithms: These act as the system’s “reflectors” [33]. They ensure a zero
energy footprint to the network in real-time [12, 21-23, 31, 32]. When a member draws energy,
the AI instantly commands EC batteries to inject an equivalent amount back into the grid [21-24,
31, 32]. This makes the EC “invisible” and beneficial for the network, as it eliminates demand
peaks and allows operation even on saturated networks without immediate upgrades [12, 21, 23,
27, 31, 32].
“Social Synergy” as a Strategic Network Partner
The intelligent management offered by “Social Synergy” transforms the Energy Community from
a simple consumer into a valuable partner for the Network Operator (AEC) [12, 13, 38-41].
———————–Page 7 End———————–
•
Predictable and Flexible Operations: The EC becomes a predictable and flexible client that helps
stabilize the network rather than disrupting it [12, 13, 38-41]. The AI’s precision and planning
ensure that the EC’s behavior is known to the Network Operator, allowing better integration of
RES into the overall system [13, 42].
•
Increased RES Penetration for All: By acting as an energy “sponge,” the system allows all PV
producers in an area to continue producing, even during peak times when the grid might
otherwise mandate curtailment [6, 12, 13, 41, 43]. The EC’s distributed batteries absorb excess
energy from the grid, turning what would be “wasted” energy into a valuable reserve [6, 12, 13,
43]. This effectively increases the capacity of the entire local grid to absorb clean energy,
reducing curtailments for everyone [6, 12, 13, 41, 43].
•
Solution for Saturated Networks: The model enables adding significant new RES capacity (e.g.,
50 MW) to “saturated” grids like the Latsia substation, without the need for immediate,
expensive, and time-consuming infrastructure upgrades by the EAC [6, 12, 13, 44, 45]. Instead of
adding to congestion, the ECs absorb excess energy, acting as a “treatment for satiety” for the
grid [6, 12, 13, 45, 46].
•
Virtual Power Plant (VPP) Functionality: The “Social Synergy” model transforms a group of
consumers into a smart, Virtual Power Plant (VPP) [6, 40, 47, 48]. By intelligently integrating and
managing many small, scattered production and storage units as one large, single virtual unit, it
achieves “economies of scale” [40, 49, 50]. This VPP provides valuable balancing services to the
grid, which has tremendous value in itself and can create new revenue streams for the EC [13,
38, 40, 41, 43, 51].
In essence, the “Social Synergy” model’s AI-driven architecture directly addresses the critical
challenge of grid stability in a high-RES environment, transforming it from a vulnerability into an
opportunity for efficient, reliable, and sustainable energy management for all stakeholders [10,
48, 52].
——————————————————————————–
Social Synergy: Sustaining Equipment Life and Investment
The “Social Synergy” model places significant emphasis on ensuring the longevity and sustained
performance of its physical equipment, particularly its most expensive assets: the batteries [1-5].
This is achieved through a combination of sophisticated technological management and
proactive financial planning.
Here’s how the model addresses equipment longevity:
•
Battery Management System (BMS) Algorithms (Primary Control):
◦
The core technological mechanism for ensuring equipment longevity lies in the Battery
Management System (BMS) algorithms [1, 2, 4-9]. These algorithms are embedded directly
within each battery’s local control system, operating at the Primary Control (bottom) level of the
hierarchical control architecture [2, 6, 8].
◦
Their primary purpose is to protect the physical infrastructure of the system, particularly the
batteries, by ensuring their safe operation and longevity [2, 4, 5].
◦
BMS algorithms continuously monitor real-time data from battery sensors in millisecond scale,
including parameters such as voltage, current, temperature of each cell, and charge cycles [2, 4,
5].
———————–Page 8 End———————–
◦
They are designed to prevent situations that could damage the batteries, such as overcharging,
deep discharge, and overheating [2, 4, 5]. They also work to balance the charge between cells to
maximize the battery’s lifespan [2, 4, 5].
◦
This continuous, autonomous monitoring and protection ensures the safety, reliability, and
long-term return on investment from the batteries, which are a major component of the project’s
cost [2, 4].
•
Dedicated Reserve for Battery Replacement (Financial Planning):
◦
The “Social Synergy” model incorporates a critical element for long-term forecasting by including
a specific cost component for “Reserve for Battery Replacement” at €0.015/kWh within its
detailed cost structure [10-19].
◦
This reserve is built from day one to cover the future cost of purchasing new batteries after their
specific lifespan, which is typically 10-15 years [10, 11, 13-15].
◦
By proactively creating this reserve, the Energy Community will not face a huge, one-off cost in
the future, thereby ensuring its uninterrupted operation and financial stability over the long term
[10, 11, 13, 14]. This foresight is crucial for the overall sustainability of the project [14, 15].
•
Infrastructure Maintenance Costs:
◦
Beyond battery-specific reserves, the model also allocates funds for general “Infrastructure
Maintenance” at €0.010/kWh [11-20].
◦
This covers the regular, preventive maintenance of all equipment, such as photovoltaic panels
and inverters, which is essential for maximizing their performance and extending their operational
lifetime [11, 13-15, 20].
In conclusion, the “Social Synergy” model ensures equipment longevity through a holistic
approach that combines advanced AI-driven BMS algorithms for real-time protection of its critical
battery assets with proactive financial planning for their eventual replacement, alongside general
infrastructure maintenance [1, 2, 15]. These measures collectively contribute to the model’s
long-term sustainability and reliability, safeguarding the community’s investment and ensuring
continuous energy benefits [2, 15].
———————–Page 9 End———————–